Fading Sprint Cup cautions stir talk
Drivers balancing desire to win with place in points standings
Saturday, Jun. 02, 2012
- Race updates: See how they run
- Raceday: Your guide to Sunday's FedEx 400
- Anger issues for Kurt Busch again
- Mark Martin on pole for FedEx 400
- Chart: Fewer cautions in 2012 NASCAR season
- Dover's tricky concrete commands respect
- Sprint Cup points standings
- Saturday's Cup race preview: Quaker State 400
- Fedex 400 starting lineup
DOVER, Del. The yellow flag has become an endangered species in NASCAR Sprint Cup racing.
Heading into Sundays FedEx 400 at Dover International Speedway, the number of cautions on the Cup circuit has been cut by more than one-third from 106 to 66 (38 percent) from 2011 to this season. The 2012 average of 5.5 cautions per race is more than three fewer than 2011s 8.8.
Why have there been so many more and longer green-flag runs? Nobody seems to be quite certain. But theories abound.
I just think guys are racing smarter, said driver Jeff Gordon. I think the quality of the drivers and the way theyre using their heads. And the cars certainly have a lot of grip in them so they dont get out as shape as much as they used to.
resulted in the fastest race, time-wise, in the events history.
The lengthy green-flag runs have come on all kinds of tracks:
• Texas and Kansas, both 1.5-mile tracks, had two and three caution flags, respectively, on consecutive weeks in April.
• At 3/4-mile Richmond, there were five cautions none due to an accident.
• At 2-mile California, the only caution came on Lap 125 because of rain. The race was red-flagged four laps later.
Last weeks Coca-Cola 600 at Charlotte Motor Speedway provided a good example of whats been happening. There were only five cautions four of them due to debris on the track and another to a one-car accident involving Travis Kvapil.
Cup points leader Greg Biffle finished fourth at Charlotte and stayed out of trouble the whole way. He said that the lack of cautions hasnt been because of drivers trying to protect their position in the points standings. Points are harder to come by in the new system instituted by NASCAR in 2011.
My obligation when I strap into that thing is to win, said Biffle.
Still, there is a sense from others that some drivers are points racing worrying more about where they are in the standings than racing aggressively to win. Then theres the common sense angle: Wrecking a car is expensive.
Guys have always point-raced, smart drivers have, said Dale Earnhardt Jr., who is fourth in the standings. The penalty for finishing last, versus the old system, is a lot tougher than it was. Youve got to keep your car clean and bring it home in one piece. You cant go out there and cost a lot of money for your owner and other people as well.
If you go out there and tear up a lot of stuff, it gets you sent out of the sport pretty quick.
Wrecking, of course, is part of NASCARs attraction to its fans. But its not something drivers want to do.
You cant plan on winning a race or a championship if you are wrecking, said Carl Edwards. There is not a points system that NASCAR can devise that is going to make us wreck race cars. We can talk about it all we want, but we are all going to race, not to wreck.
Of the 66 caution flags shown this season, 41 percent have been due to accidents. Debris on the track have accounted for 30 percent.
Im surprised that we dont have more cautions, said five-time champion Jimmie Johnson. When I look around and watch my competitors, we are crossed up, slapping the fence. There is hard racing. There is side-by-side racing. I dont know where the cautions have gone. Im glad Im not a part of them.
And as there is in any group of like-minded people, there is peer pressure.
You just lose a lot of respect from your peers when you make a lot of dumb mistakes and cause a lot of crashes, said Earnhardt. So guys dont do that any more.
Scott: 704-358-5889; Twitter: @davidscott14
The Charlotte Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since charlotteobserver.com does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Charlotte Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.



