Calling debris cautions is a dirty job
Inside Motorsports
Thursday, May. 03, 2012
Sometimes NASCAR cant win.
Thats the only way to explain the uproar over a caution for debris late in Saturday nights Sprint Cup race at Richmond, Va., which helped Kyle Busch secure his first win of the season.
Immediately after the race Tony Stewart the driver who had the most to lose from the caution cried foul, claiming the debris was nothing more than a water bottle that wasnt in the racing groove.
His word was taken by many as gospel, which of course reignited the debate whether NASCAR throws phantom debris cautions, tightening the field for better racing.
But at least three drivers, including Kevin Harvick and Carl Edwards who was black-flagged on the previous restart and not happy with NASCAR had radioed in, complaining of debris in various areas of the track.
In any case, driver discontent is interesting, and that became the lingering issue after the race.
Of course, there is always debris on a race track. Racing at 200 mph tends to create it.
NASCARs responsibility and therefore, its judgment is to determine when a caution should be declared to remove it.
When it comes to safety, caution is the better course, every time. And NASCAR might be better off playing it safe more often, not avoiding a caution flag because it may come at an inconvenient time (such as during green-flag pit stops).
And forcing TV to show the debris in each case wouldnt only change the debate from whether there was debris to whether the debris was worth calling for a caution.
Affected drivers and their fans are unlikely to find any satisfaction in seeing what was picked up from the track.
More racing news, blogs, photos and more at www.ThatsRacin.com.
The Charlotte Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since charlotteobserver.com does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Charlotte Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.



