Mayfield: NASCAR spiked my sample
Saturday, Jul. 18, 2009
CHARLOTTE -- Jeremy Mayfield feels some sense of vindication.
"Were very excited about the results," he told NewsChannel 36 after an independent lab, LabCorp, sent results to Mayfields attorneys showing he tested negative for meth. Those results are from a urine sample he gave within an hour of giving a separate urine sample to NASCAR, though NASCAR's lab results claim Mayfield tested positive for the drug.
Asked how both tests can come back with two different results Mayfield said, "That's what wed like to know and that's what were gonna find out."
Mayfield's attorney suggests NASCAR might be "spiking" the sample.
And Mayfield agrees. "Its for sure a spiked sample," he said.
Mayfield says his lawyers have had him tested repeatedly, and the only samples that have come up positive for meth are the ones NASCAR has tested. "They are hell-bent on proving Jeremy Mayfield is wrong. They keep digging themselves a hole [and it] keeps getting bigger and bigger," said John Buric who is representing Mayfield.
Mayfield says its just driving his goal to prove his innocence.
"Im in this for the long haul," he said. "Were gonna fight it out."
Even though the veteran driver knows he'll never race again.
"I know better," he said. "Nobody's gonna touch me, its not gonna happen. Now that I don't have to worry about going back racing - because obviously they are not going to let me - I don't have to worry about what I say. Its like the bully in school [who] got a hold of the wrong little guy."
When asked for comment on the latest independent test results, NASCAR spokesman Ramsey Poston responded: "They seem to be light on details don't you think? It's all pretty transparent. We will continue to let real science and sworn affidavits do our talking."
The Charlotte Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since charlotteobserver.com does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The Charlotte Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.



